<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Posts on Super 16mm Lenses</title>
    <link>https://super-16mm-lenses.pages.dev/posts/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Posts on Super 16mm Lenses</description>
    
    <generator>Hugo -- 0.151.1</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://super-16mm-lenses.pages.dev/posts/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Getting that film look with super 16mm lenses</title>
      <link>https://super-16mm-lenses.pages.dev/posts/super-16mm-lenses/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://super-16mm-lenses.pages.dev/posts/super-16mm-lenses/</guid>
      <description>I&amp;#39;ve spent way too much time lately hunting for the perfect super 16mm lenses, mostly because digital sensors just feel a little too &amp;#39;perfect&amp;#39; sometimes. There&amp;#39;s a specific texture you get from these older pieces of glass that you just can&amp;#39;t</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
